Rerun, Reread: A Follow Up of Sorts
While I was reading D&G the other morning, I made some notes as usual and underlined and starred bits I liked or question-marked things I didn't understand. And I drew out a few things in my cartoony way...
But sometimes it just comes down to understanding what the words mean and understanding someone else's associations - where they're coming from, not where you're coming from. When D&G start out chapter 3 with 'stratification', my mind jumped to the Grand Canyon. I 'saw' the concept in geological terms. When they moved on to talk about 'double articulation', I immediately assumed it was geological and tried to understand it in those terms. Finally, yesterday (cause it was bugging me), I decided to look up 'double articulation' in the dictionary. And now I know that I'm supposed to be thinking about linguistics and the infinite use of finite elements in language. Reading about this in D&G is bound to be tricky because they won't merely describe it, they'll enact it, they'll double articulate 'double articulation' like crazy. I know them now. They won't be able to resist!
1 Comments:
Oh, newsflash!
I was reading an article yesterday called "The Languages of Rural Landscapes" by Paul Claval. This is for something I'm writing right now and...guess what! there's quite a tradition of linking geography and linguistics so my impulses in reading D&G as the Grand Canyon maybe wasn't so dopey...but, rather, thought-provoking. At least, I'm thinking about it now...
Post a Comment
<< Home